IA: Private Equity Stock Review 2010 Watch List.

==================================================
Private Equity Stock Review, Friday, 1/22/2010.

Los Angeles, CA 49..56F Rain.
Chicago, IL, 33..36F Cloudy.
Port Jefferson, NY, 28..41F Sunny.
==================================================

1. We're Back.
2. Note on Google
3. Hedgeweek 2010.
4. Is Rodman (RODM) a Gold Play ?
3. Disclaimer.

To subscribe,send a email to:
mailto:join-internetstockreview@laser.sparklist.com

To contact us send a email to: roland@internetstockreview.com and put
"dear roland" in the subject line.

==================================================
Private Equity Stock Review: www.privateequitystockreview.com

1. We're Back.

Okay, we're back with the names for the 2010 Watch List -- pronto. Our guess is that news just out (yesterday) -- could bump the groups valuation, by 20% over the short term.

Performance 2009.

1. Blackstone Group (BX) up 69%.
2. Fortress Group (FIG) up 97%.
3. Rodman & Renshaw (RODM) up 311%.
4. MVC Capital (MVC) up 47%.
5. Och-Ziff Capital Management (OZM) up 120%.
6. GLG Partners (GLG) up 29%.

We'll release the names, symbols and prices for now -- to mark our territory. More details coming later.

The stocks on our Watch List for 2009 gained an average of 82%. Interestingly the The Hennessee Hedge Fund Index, which tracks "returns" from more than 1,000 hedge fund managers, rose only 24.6% in 2009, thus proving our thesis that it's better to own the shares of a hedge fund, then it is to have them manage your money (at least in a bull market). Ditto with mutual funds.

As another example, the main hedge fund run by Daniel Och's Och-Ziff Capital Management (Symbol: OZM) rose 23% last year. However the share price soared by 120% from where we added to the Watch List at $6.24 last year and where it closed at $13.74. Hello -- that's nearly five fold better !

Let's shine the light on that just a little brighter. If you had given former Goldman Sachs'er David Och $10 million to manage last year year, you would have roughly $12 million this year -- as in big whoop (and paid him roughly $400,000 for his efforts). If on the other hand had you bought his stock when we added it to the Watch List, the same $10 million would be worth $22 million today (and you would have paid him - or us, nothing !).

So the pecking order in wealth creation via hedge funds is:

#1. Spend your money to start a hedge fund.
#2. Invest your money in a publicly traded hedge fund.
#3. Have a hedge fund manage your money.

(David Och's firm which he started in 1994, now has $23 billion under management. If he gets the once standard 20% of gains, "he" would have made a smidgen more than $1 billion last year alone -- on a mere 23% gain.)

Anyway, the "news" we are talking about is President Obama's "Bank's Will No Longer Be Allowed..." announcement yesterday -- to bump the banking giants out of the risky and/but/or lucrative private equity business.

Weird thing is this could be bad for the market in general (one less leveraged market buyer -- in times of buying), which would of course be bad for the valuation of the holdings currently being held by Private Equity companies. Still net/net we think the less competition to manage private equity dollars, the more potential dollars to be managed by the established players. All in all, right now there are more questions than answers -- which is generally when the easy (easier) money is made.

Our list is essentially the same as last year with two more names and a few more to come.

One overriding caveat to the entire group (past, current and future) is the "out-of-the-blue" governmental/regulatory risk which fall under the "We just don't like anything about you guys, including how much money you make, how much money you have and how little in taxes you pay."

And one new caveat is the actual possibility that the government decides that the entire private equity business (including non-bank owned) is also a danger to world at large -- and comes up with some way to limit their growth in assets. Whereas the banks are too big to fail, the hedge funds may be too big to..be trading..and on margin. They could even have a special tax which escalates along with the amount of leverage a fund has !

Pricing is from exactly one minute after President Obama's speech plus 15 minutes (yes, we use delayed quotes).

1. Blackstone Group (BX) $13.37.
2. Fortress Group (FIG) $4.91.
3. Rodman & Renshaw (RODM) $4.66 (Rodman by the way is now also a gold play! Check the news.)
4. MVC Capital (MVC) $11.77.
5. Och-Ziff Capital Management (OZM) $14.02
6. GLG Partners (GLG) $2.16.
7. Ares Capital (ARCC) $13.41.
8. KKR Financial (KFN) $6.23.

We understand there that there isn't an overwhelming amount of interest in this group -- amongst our subscriber list -- which we attest to a general lack of reporting on the group from traditional business media (WSJ, CNBC, Bloomberg, etc.) We only have a few thousand subscribers and nearly all of them (we can see by their email address) are from the hedge fund/private equity business.

This is why we have the website. http://privateequitystockreview.ning.com/

If you go there you'll find its really a great way to follow the industry via a variety of RSS feeds.

==================================================

Hedgeweek 2010.

Hedgeweek's Annual report is out. You can find a link to it on the left hand side of our website

http://www.hedgeweek.com/sites/default/files/HW%20Managed%20Acts%20...

==================================================

Notes, Rodman (see news headlines) is now also a "gold Play.

http://studio-5.financialcontent.com/demo/?&Page=NEWS&Ticker=RODM

==================================================
Going Concern Statements.
We would like to point out that the majority of companies listed on the
OTC Bulletin Board have factors which create an
uncertainty about the their ability to continue as a going concern. These
concerns are typically related to financing (or lack of), competitive
environments, lack of operating history and operating at loss levels which
is typical of most start-ups.
These statement can usually be found in their most recent 10Q filings and
typically you don't have to dig to far down past the financial tables. We
like to use http://www.pinksheets.com for quick and easy access to SEC
filings. We think it would be wise for most investors to assume that all
companies listed on the OTC Bulletin Board (and many on NASDAQ) have going
concern issues.
================================================
Disclaimer: Important Distinction #1. First and foremost the Watch List is
just that. A watch list. It is not a buy list. Meaning that there will be
no buys or sales issued by the Internet Stock Review. If this was a buy
list, you can rest assured that we would crank up our Public Relations arm
into high gear, full speed ahead and damn the torpedoes to make everyone
know just how brilliant we were when we issued the list. Interviews on
CNBC, articles in Barron's and accolades in the Wall Street Journal--the
only thing we love more than money is praise and fame--but it just isn't
going to happen. What the Internet Stock Review is...is a "news
aggregation service". With the advent of the Internet, everyone knows what
that term means. What it means to us is the following: We will follow the
progress of as many Internet related publicly traded stocks as humanly
possible (The large, the small and the minuscule) and advise you of when
they have reported news. As a subscriber to the Internet Stock Review,
this means you will be able to broadly follow the entire industry right
from a single e-mail. We will report who released news and point (with
hyper links) to where the news can be found. We try to use Yahoo! Finance
as extensively as possible so we don't send you all over cyberspace. We
love Yahoo, you will too. Any decisions as to buy or sell however, are
strictly up to you. Which leads to important distinction #2. How do we get
paid? The Internet Stock Review is owned by a Public Relations firm
(Institutional Analyst Inc.) that specializes in getting (or creating)
coverage for publicly traded companies. As such, is important to note that
anytime we say anything about a company, it is because the company is a
client of our parent company, or because we would like them to be a client
of our parent company. In a nutshell, you can throw out any thoughts of us
being even a little bit impartial. It just ain't gonna happen. We love
everyone. Final note is we that have over 20,000 subscribers so please
excuse our dust. Institutional Analyst Inc. is an independent research and
investor-relations consulting firm that publishes investment-research
reports such as The Internet Stock Review on independently selected
companies. While it is its intent to identify and research companies that
it believes might prove to be profitable investments, The Internet Stock
Review is not liable for any investment decisions by its readers. Neither
The Internet Stock Review nor any report published by Internet PR Group,
Inc represent a solicitation to buy or sell the securities discussed
within the report. It is strongly recommended that any purchase or sale
decisions be discussed with a financial adviser or broker prior to
completing any such purchase or sale decision. The information contained
herein is provided as an information service only and is based upon
sources deemed reliable, but not guaranteed by The Internet Stock Review.
Past performance of previously featured companies does not guarantee the
future success of any currently featured or mentioned company. The
information contained herein is subject to change without notice, and The
Internet Stock Review assumes no responsibility to update the information
in this or any report published. Use of this or any report published by
The Internet Stock Review may be subject to the applicable rules of
certain self-regulatory organizations and the securities mentioned herein,
which are traded Over The Counter, and may not be cleared for sale in
certain states. The Internet Stock Review and/or its employees, officers,
affiliates or members of their families may have long or short positions
in any of the securities discussed in this or other reports published
herein (and/or options or warrants relating thereto) and may purchase and
or sell these securities, options or warrants from time to time in the
open market or otherwise. The Internet Stock Review may derive
compensation through research services and subscriptions and/or
investor-relations consulting from the companies featured or mentioned in
its reports. Write or call The Internet Stock Review for disclosure
details as required by Rule 17b as it relates to individual issues.
Institutional Analyst Inc., In no event shall The
Internet Stock Review report be liable for direct, indirect, incidental or
consequential damages resulting from the use of this information. The
Internet Stock Review shall be indemnified and held harmless from any
actions, claims, proceedings or liabilities with respect to the
information herein. The Internet Stock Review is not a securities
broker-dealer, investment advisor or a securities exchange and is not
registered as such with the Securities and Exchange commission nor any
state securities regulation authority. Readers of this e-mail newsletter
should recognize that the Internet Stock Review is only providing a
delivery service to electronically transmit information to potential
investors. In this respect, the Internet Stock Review is no different than
the provider of any other delivery service such as the United States Post
Office or any other express delivery service. Accordingly, investors
should be aware that the Internet Stock Review has not evaluated nor
investigated any of the companies listed in this e-mail to determine their
merit or the risk of investment in any such company. The Internet does not
endorse any company listed herein and the Internet Stock Review does not
represent that the information contained in any offering documents states
all material facts or does not omit a material fact necessary to make the
statements therein not misleading. roland@internetstockreview.com

Views: 7

Comment

You need to be a member of Private Equity Stock Review to add comments!

Join Private Equity Stock Review

© 2017   Created by Institutional Analyst Inc..   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service